• F Porreca, Q B Tang, D Bian, M Riedl, R Elde, and J Lai.
• Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. frankp@u.arizona.edu
• Brain Res. 1998 Jun 8; 795 (1-2): 197-203.

AbstractPrevious studies in rats have shown that spinal morphine loses potency and efficacy to suppress an acute nociceptive stimulus applied to the tail or the paw following injury to peripheral nerves by tight ligation of the L5/L6 spinal nerves. Additionally, intrathecal (i.th.) morphine is ineffective in suppressing tactile allodynia at fully antinociceptive doses in these animals. The molecular basis for this loss of morphine potency and efficacy in nerve injury states is not known. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is a generalized, multi-segmental loss of opioid mu (mu) receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord after nerve injury. This hypothesis was tested here by determining whether nerve injury produces (a) a decrease in mu receptors in the lumbar spinal cord; (b) a decrease in the affinity of ligand-receptor interaction, (c) a decrease in the fraction of high-affinity state of the mu receptors and (d) a reduced ability of morphine to activate G-proteins via mu receptors. Lumbar spinal cord tissues were examined 7 days after the nerve injury, a time when stable allodynia was observed. At this point, no differences were observed in the receptor density or affinity of [3H]DAMGO (mu selective agonist) or [3H]CTAP (mu selective antagonist) in the dorsal quadrant of lumbar spinal cord ipsilateral to nerve injury. Additionally, no change in morphine's potency and efficacy in activating G-proteins was observed. In contrast, staining for mu opioid receptors using mu-selective antibodies revealed a discrete loss of mu opioid receptors localized ipsilateral to the nerve injury and specific for sections taken at the L6 level. At these spinal segments, mu opioid receptors were decreased in laminae I and II. The data indicate that the loss of mu opioid receptors are highly localized and may contribute to the loss of morphine activity involving input at these spinal segments (e.g., foot-flick response). On the other hand, the lack of a generalized loss of opioid mu receptors across spinal segments makes it unlikely that this is the primary cause for the loss of potency and efficacy of mu opioids to suppress multi-segmental reflexes, such as the tail-flick response.Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

39 keywords...

hide…