• R P J Meijer, J A Halm, and T Schepers.
• Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Reinier de Graafweg 3-11, Delft 2625 AD, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rubenmeijer1990@gmail.com.
• Foot (Edinb). 2017 Aug 1; 32: 35-38.

IntroductionBecause of poor skin conditions and comorbidity, open reduction and internal fixation in ankle fractures is frequently contra-indicated in the elderly. This study reports the results of two temporary fixation types in fragility fractures in the older patient: transarticular Steinmann pin fixation and external fixation.MethodsPatients aged over 60 treated with a Steinmann pin or external fixation were retrospectively included. Patient, fracture and treatment characteristics were collected.ResultsFifteen patients were included. Nine were managed using a Steinmann pin and six by external fixation. All reached fracture consolidation. Patients treated with a Steinmann pin underwent a median of 2 operations and the pin was left in situ for 80 days. Three patients suffered from superficial wound infection. X-ray showed malreduction in 67% and only two patients returned to pre-injury mobility. A median of 2 operations with 32 fixation days was reported in the external fixation group. This group showed one deep infection. In 50% there was malreduction, one patient experienced disability in ambulation at the end of treatment.ConclusionBoth techniques show few complications, but have, as expected, poor results in fracture reduction and functional outcome. External fixation and subsequent internal fixation could result in better functional outcome.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…