-
- Tim Hausdörfer, Philipp Kanzow, Claudia Tschammler, Manfred Herrmann, and Annette Wiegand.
- Tim Hausdörfer, Dr med dent, is Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Philipp Kanzow, Dr med dent, MBA, is Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Claudia Tschammler, Dr med dent, is Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Manfred Herrmann, Dr rer nat, is Assistant Professor, Division of Medical Education Research and Curriculum Development, Study Deanery of University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; and Annette Wiegand, Prof Dr med dent, is Professor and Head, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. tim.hausdoerfer@med.uni-goettingen.de.
- J Dent Educ. 2018 Sep 1; 82 (9): 943-948.
AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate dental students' retention of factual and procedural knowledge gained in a preclinical course in operative dentistry during a clinical dental curriculum. In 2017, all 157 seventh- to tenth-semester dental students at a dental school in Germany were asked to repeat the same written examination performed at the end of the preclinical course in the sixth semester. The examinations consisted of 30 multiple-choice questions covering factual and procedural knowledge. The percentage of correctly answered questions per exam and differences in correct answers between the original examination and the re-examination (per question) were analyzed. Students were also asked to self-rate their percentage of correctly answered questions and their knowledge in various disciplines of operative dentistry at the times of the original examination and the re-examination. After exclusions, data were analyzed for 129 students, for a participation rate of 82%. For the seventh- and tenth-semester students, the results on the original examination and the re-examination were not significantly different, while the eighth- and ninth-semester students performed significantly better on the original examination than the re-examination. In all semesters, procedural knowledge remained stable between the original examination and the re-examination, while factual knowledge decreased slightly. Their performance on the original examination was underestimated by the eighth- and ninth-semester students. All the students underestimated their performance on the re-examination. Students mostly rated their knowledge level significantly higher on the original examination than on the re-examination. Overall, this study found that factual and procedural knowledge gained in a preclinical course in operative dentistry was not increased during the clinical dental curriculum.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.