• Occupational medicine · Sep 2003

    Personal and occupational predictors of sciatica in the GAZEL cohort.

    • A Leclerc, F Tubach, M-F Landre, and A Ozguler.
    • INSERM U88-IFR69, Hôpital National de Saint-Maurice, St-Maurice, France. annette.leclerc@st-maurice.inserm.fr
    • Occup Med (Lond). 2003 Sep 1;53(6):384-91.

    BackgroundThe objectives of this prospective study were to investigate personal and occupational predictors of sciatica and to compare the risk factors for sciatica and those for low back pain without sciatica.MethodsThe study analysed data from 841 men, initially free from low back pain, who were followed for 2 years. Subjects were participants in the French GAZEL cohort of employees of the national electricity and gas company. The predictive factors for sciatica and low back pain without sciatica were compared with a polytomous model.ResultsHeight and driving were predictors only for sciatica, and bending forward and backward at work was a predictor only for low back pain without sciatica. The odds ratio (OR) for sciatica associated with 'height >180 cm' was 3, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.4-6.5; for driving >2 h daily it was 2 (CI = 0.94-4.10) and for driving >2 h several days a week 2.7 (CI = 1.20-6.10).ConclusionThis study confirmed that height and driving are risk factors for sciatica and that sciatica has specific predictors different from those for other types of low back pain. Future studies should consider sciatica separately from these.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…