• Neil Mittal, Blaize C Majdic, Adam P Sima, and Carrie L Peterson.
• Virginia Commonwealth University, Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, College of Engineering, Rehabilitation Engineering to Advance Ability Lab, Biotech Eight, 737 N 5(th) Street, Richmond, VA 23219, United States. Electronic address: mittaln3@vcu.edu.
• Neurosci. Lett. 2021 Nov 1; 764: 136220.

AbstractIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that can increase corticomotor excitability in distal upper limb muscles, but the effect on the more proximal biceps is unknown. The study objective was to determine the effect of iTBS on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in non-impaired individuals. Ten individuals completed three sessions, and an additional ten individuals completed one session in a secondary study; each session included sham and active iTBS. Resting and active motor thresholds (RMT, AMT) were determined prior to sham and active iTBS. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to single pulse TMS served as our measure of corticomotor excitability. In our primary cohort, MEPs were recorded with biphasic stimulation to accurately capture the same neurons affected by biphasic iTBS. MEPs were recorded at an intensity of 120% of RMT, or for instances of high RMTs, 100% of the maximum stimulator output (MSO), at baseline, and 10, 20, and 30 minutes after iTBS. MEPs were normalized by the maximum voluntary isometric muscle activity. In the secondary, MEPs were recorded with monophasic stimulation, which increased our ability to record MEPs at 120% of RMT. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine the effect of iTBS on normalized MEPs (nMEPs), with analyses to evaluate the interaction of the biceps AMT:RMT ratio as a measure of corticomotor conductance. Change in nMEPs from baseline did not differ for the active and sham conditions (p = 0.915 ) when MEPs were assessed with biphasic stimulation. With MEPs assessed by monophasic stimulation, there was an increase in biceps nMEPs after active iTBS, and no change in nMEPs after sham. Our results suggest that when RMTs are expected to be high when measured with biphasic stimulation, monophasic stimulation can better capture changes in MEPs induced by iTBS, and biphasic stimulation appears limited in its ability to capture changes in biceps MEPs in nonimpaired individuals. In both cohorts, increased corticomotor excitability after iTBS occurred when the biceps AMT:RMT ratio was high. Thus, the AMT:RMT ratio may be a predictive measure to evaluate the potential for iTBS to increase biceps corticomotor excitability.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

6 keywords...

hide…