• Thaísa Malbar Rodrigues, Thayssa Dalla Costa Escobar, Rodrigo Stênio Moll de Souza, Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios, and Marcos Rosa-Júnior.
• Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes - Vitória (ES), Brazil.
• Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2021 Nov 1; 67 (11): 1616-1621.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the results obtained using SpectroView® (SV) and J-Magnetic Resonance User Interface (jMRUI) from the same magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy of hydrogen data.MethodsData from 23 males with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 23 healthy non-AUD males were acquired by a 1.5 Tesla MR using a PRESS sequence (TE=30 ms) in four voxels located in the right frontal and left frontal (RF and LF) lobes, and posterior cingulate (AC and PC). The ratio of the signals from both N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) and choline (Cho) over creatine (Cr) was calculated automatically using SV and semiautomatically by an expert neuroradiologist using jMRUI. The software' agreement was calculated by the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of the ratio of the obtained values.ResultsThe standard deviation was greater in jMRUI than in SV. Although there was a correlation between the results from both methods, it was not possible to predict their variance from one another. Additionally, the 95% LoA showed that jMRUI values were expected to vary from 38 to 190% of those obtained using SV for NAA/Cr in RF of AUD subjects and from 48 to 196% for NAA/Cr in CA of non-AUD individuals.ConclusionsThe difference between the methods may represent clinically significant magnitudes. We suggest the use of the same method when comparing spectroscopic data. We also suggest that in clinical practice, the automatic method should be preferred.

7 keywords...

hide…