• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Mar 2018

    Comparative Study

    Prognostic significance and adjuvant chemotherapy survival benefits of a solid or micropapillary pattern in patients with resected stage IB lung adenocarcinoma.

    • Fangfei Qian, Wenjia Yang, Rui Wang, Jianlin Xu, Shuyuan Wang, Yanwei Zhang, Bo Jin, Keke Yu, and Baohui Han.
    • Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018 Mar 1; 155 (3): 1227-1235.e2.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic significance and beneficiaries of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in various histological patterns of stage IB lung adenocarcinoma according to the 8th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification.MethodsA total of 1131 patients with pathological stage IB lung adenocarcinoma according to the 8th TNM classification who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy were enrolled in this study. Based on the proportion of solid/micropapillary components, the patients were classified into 3 groups: solid/micropapillary-negative (SMPN) (n = 719; median survival, 49.7 months; interquartile range [IQR]. 35.1-67.0 months), solid/micropapillary-minor (SMPM; >5% but not predominant) (n = 272; median survival, 38.8 months; IQR, 26.6-51.5 months) and solid/micropapillary-predominant (SMPP; >5% and the most dominant) (n = 140; median survival, 39.6 months; IQR, 26.8-52.5 months). The predictors of disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival were investigated. To reduce selection bias, propensity score-matching analysis was implemented before survival data were compared.ResultsOur data show significant differences in survival rates based on the proportion of solid/micropapillary patterns. The SMPM group had significantly higher cumulative incidences of lung cancer-specific death (P = .000) and recurrence (P = .000) compared with the SMPN group, so did the SMPP group when compared with SMPM patients (P = .000 for both). Multivariate analysis showed that the SMPM and SMPP patterns were poor prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-3.09 and HR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.69-7.71, respectively) and recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.20-2.24 and HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.64-3.60, respectively), as were older age, male sex, smoking history, larger tumor size, necrosis, and abnormal pulmonary function. Survival analysis stratified by histological pattern showed that patients with the SMPP pattern who received ACT had obviously lower cumulative incidences of lung cancer-specific death (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.93; P = .031) and recurrence (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88; P = .017).ConclusionsSolid/micropapillary patterns were associated with poor prognosis, even if they were not predominant. ACT contributed to survival benefits in the SMPP subgroup of patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma.Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…