• Przegla̧d lekarski · Jan 2003

    Comparative Study

    [Acute appendicitis--open or laparoscopic surgery?].

    • Marcin Strzałka, Andrzej Bobrzyński, Andrzej Budzyński, Zbigniew Biesiada, and Kazimierz Rembiasz.
    • II Katedra Chirurgii Ogólnej Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 31-501 Kraków, ul. Kopernika 21. marcin.strzalka@interia.pl
    • Prz. Lek. 2003 Jan 1; 60 Suppl 7: 70-4.

    UnlabelledLaparoscopy is used more and more frequently in the treatment of abdominal emergencies including acute appendicitis. This technique has a lot of advantages especially in the group of the young female patients, where the differential diagnosis between gynecological diseases and appendicitis is difficult.Aim Of The StudyThe study is designed to compare the results of open and laparoscopic exploration in patients with suspected appendicitis.Material And MethodsFrom 1998-2001 we performed 278 operations for suspicion of appendicitis in the 2nd Dept. of Surgery of the Jagiellonian University. There were 127 laparoscopic procedures performed in 46 men and 81 women (mean age 28.6 years) and 151 classical exploration in 99 men and 52 women (mean age 37.9 years). We reviewed retrospectively the patients' data analysing age, sex, duration of the procedure, length of the hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complication rate.ResultsThe patients operated classically were older than patients operated laparoscopically. The proportion of male and female patients was reversed in both types of exploration. The female patients composed a majority (2/3) in the case of laparoscopic procedures and minority (1/3) in the case of open operations. The average duration of open appendectomy was 43 min. as compared with 49 min. of laparoscopic procedure, which was however getting shorter in the analysed period. The mean length of the hospital stay was twice shorter after laparoscopic appendectomy (4.8 days vs 8.4 days). There were only 4 (3.15%) complications connected with laparoscopic technique and 34 (22.52%) complications after open appendectomy. There were 12 (9.45%) conversions, most of them in patients with the retrocoecal position of the appendix. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed in similar percentage in both operation types (laparoscopy--78.74%, open technique--79.47%). There were also similar proportions of the patients with no macroscopical changes in the appendix and with other abdominal diseases.ConclusionsLaparoscopy allows for the precise diagnosis and final treatment in most patients with the suspected acute appendicitis. Some patients also avoid laparotomy. Hospital stay is significantly shorter and complication rate is markedly lower among patients operated laparoscopically.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.