• Ryan S Morris, Lauren N Hoye, Mohammed H Elnagar, Phimon Atsawasuwan, Maria Therese Galang-Boquiren, Jennifer Caplin, Grace Costa Viana, Ales Obrez, and Budi Kusnoto.
• Private practice, Chicago, Ill.
• Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep 1; 156 (3): 420-428.

IntroductionThis study aimed to test the accuracy of the 3-dimensional (3D) digital dental models generated by the Dental Monitoring (DM) smartphone application in both photograph and video modes over successive DM examinations in comparison with 3D digital dental models generated by the iTero Element intraoral scanner.MethodsTen typodonts with setups of class I malocclusion and comparable severity of anterior crowding were used in the study. iTero Element scans along with DM examination in photograph and video modes were performed before tooth movement and after each set of 10 Invisalign aligners for each typodont. Stereolithography (STL) files generated from the DM examinations in photograph and video modes were superimposed with the STL files from the iTero scans using GOM Inspect software to determine the accuracy of both photograph and video modes of DM technology.ResultsNo clinically significant differences, according to the American Board of Orthodontics-determined standards, were found. Mean global deviations for the maxillary arch ranged from 0.00149 to 0.02756 mm in photograph mode and from 0.0148 to 0.0256 mm in video mode. Mean global deviations for the mandibular arch ranged from 0.0164 to 0.0275 mm in photograph mode and from 0.0150 to 0.0264 mm in video mode. Statistically significant differences were found between the 3D models generated by the iTero and the DM application in photograph and video modes over successive DM examinations.Conclusions3D digital dental models generated by the DM smartphone application in photograph and video modes are accurate enough to be used for clinical applications.Published by Elsevier Inc.

28 keywords...

hide…