• Somatosens Mot Res · Jan 2013

    Comparative Study

    Reliability of a new technique for intraoral mapping of somatosensory sensitivity.

    • Shengyi Lu, Lene Baad-Hansen, Zhenting Zhang, and Peter Svensson.
    • Dental Implantology Center, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China. eflsy@hotmail.com
    • Somatosens Mot Res. 2013 Jan 1;30(1):30-6.

    AbstractDiagnosis of intraoral pain conditions may be facilitated by assessment of somatosensory sensitivity not only at a single test site but also at multiple test sites, that is, intraoral somatosensory mapping. No standardized mapping techniques are currently available. The aim of this study was to evaluate: (1) spatial variations in somatosensory sensitivity; (2) the reliability of a new technique for mapping of intraoral somatosensory sensitivity. Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in two experimental sessions. In each session, three mechanical stimuli (32 mN and 512 mN von Frey and electronic von Frey (EVF)) were each applied to 15 test sites in a 5 × 3 matrix located at the gingivomucosal area adjacent to the upper premolar region on both sides. A custom-made silicone-based template secured standardization of the test sites. The subjects rated the perceived intensity on a 0-50-100 numerical rating scale (NRS) for tactile (32 mN) and pinprick (512 mN) stimuli and determined the pinprick threshold (PiPT) by EVF by pushing a stop button. Analyses of variance for NRS scores and PiPT for all three stimulus modalities showed no significant differences between sessions or sides (p = 0.077), whereas there were significant site-to-site differences (p < 0.001). Generally, the anterior and apical regions were more sensitive than posterior and cervical regions. Intraclass correlation coefficients for between session reliability ranged between 0.76 and 0.87 for NRS scores and PiPT measures. In conclusion, good test-retest reliability of intraoral somatosensory mapping was found with the help of a new template, which can be used for further studies of intraoral pain mechanisms.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…