• M Anne Harris.
• School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. aharris7@interchange.ubc.ca
• Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010 Sep 15; 172 (6): 645-7; discussion 651-2.

AbstractEpidemiologic research that uses administrative records (rather than registries or clinical surveys) to identify cases for study has been increasingly restricted because of concerns about privacy, making unbiased population-based research less practicable. In their article, Nattinger et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(6):637-644) present a method for using administrative data to contact participants that has been well received. However, the methods employed for calculating and reporting response rates require further consideration, particularly the classification of untraceable cases as ineligible. Depending on whether response rates are used to evaluate the potential for bias to influence study results or to evaluate the acceptability of the method of contact, different fractions may be considered. To improve the future study of epidemiologic research methods, a consensus on the calculation and reporting of study response rates should be sought.

14 keywords...

hide…