• Xiang Li, Zhi-Lin Ni, Jun Wang, Xiu-Cheng Liu, Hui-Lian Guan, Ming-Sheng Dai, Xing Gao, Yang Zhou, Xiao-Yi Hu, Xun Sun, Jian Zhou, Qiu Zhao, Qian-Qian Zhang, He Liu, Yuan Han, and Jun-Li Cao.
• Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
• J Anesth. 2022 Apr 1; 36 (2): 303315303-315.

AbstractLow tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed by individualized PEEP was a new method to optimize the intraoperative pulmonary function. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the effects of individualized PEEP + RM on intraoperative pulmonary function and hemodynamic with other PEEP and RM settings. The primary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance, while the secondary outcomes were intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In total, we identified 15 clinical trials containing 36 randomized groups with 3634 participants. Ventilation strategies were divided into eight groups by four PEEP (L: low, M: moderate, H: high, and I: individualized) and two RM (yes or no) settings. The main results showed that IPEEP + RM group was superior to all other groups regarding to both oxygenation index and dynamic compliance. LPEEP group was inferior to LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, and IPEEP + RM in terms of oxygenation index and LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, HPEEP + RM, IPEEP, and IPEEP + RM in terms of dynamic compliance. All comparisons were similar for secondary outcomes. Our analysis suggested that individualized PEEP and RM may be the optimal low tidal volume ventilation strategy at present, while low PEEP without RM is not suggested.© 2021. The Author(s).

14 keywords...

hide…