• Mauricio A Escobar, Bethann M Pflugeisen, Yolanda Duralde, Carolynn J Morris, Dustin Haferbecker, Paul J Amoroso, Hilare Lemley, and Elizabeth C Pohlson.
• Mary Bridge Children's Hospital and Health Center, Tacoma, WA, USA. Mauricio.Escobar@multicare.org.
• Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2016 Apr 1; 32 (4): 377-86.

PurposeEach year, nearly 1 million children in the USA are victims of non-accidental trauma (NAT). Missed diagnosis or poor case management often leads to repeat/escalation injury. Victims of recurrent NAT are at higher risk for severe morbidity and mortality resulting from abuse. The objective of this review is to describe the evolution and implementation of this tool and evaluate our institutional response to NAT prior to implementation.MethodsA systematic guideline for the evaluation of pediatric patients in which NAT is suspected or confirmed was developed and implemented at a level II pediatric trauma hospital. To understand the state of our institution prior to implementation of the guideline, a review of 117 confirmed NAT cases at our hospital over the prior 4 years was conducted.ResultsIn the absence of a systematic management guideline, important and relevant social and family history red flags were often missing in the initial evaluation. Patients with perineal bruising experienced significantly higher mortality than patients without perineal bruising (27.3 vs. 5.7%; p = 0.03) and were significantly more likely to require surgery (45.5 vs. 14.2%; p = 0.02).ConclusionDevelopment and implementation of a standardized tool for the differentiation and diagnosis of NAT and creation of a structured electronic medical record note should improve the description and documentation of child abuse cases in a community hospital setting. A retrospective analysis demonstrated that in the absence of such a tool, management of NAT may be inconsistent or incomplete. Perineal injury is an especially ominous red flag finding.

28 keywords...

hide…