• Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Mar 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    [Non-bismuth quadruple therapy versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized controlled study].

    • Shujun Wang, Weihong Wang, Yunxiang Chu, Guigen Teng, and Fulian Hu.
    • Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
    • Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Mar 4; 94 (8): 576-9.

    ObjectiveTo compare the efficacies of non-bismuth quadruple therapy for 7 days versus standard triple therapy for 7 or 10 days in initial treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) .MethodsA randomized, open-labeled, controlled trial comparing non-bismuth quadruple therapy with standard triple therapy was performed at Peking University First Hospital from August 2010 to July 2012. A total of 246 patients with a diagnosis of H.pylori infection by (13)C-urea breath test and receiving no eradication therapy were randomly divided into non-bismuth quadruple therapy and standard triple therapy for 7 or 10 days. There were 110 males and 136 females with an age range of 18-75 years. Among them, 81 patients received non-bismuth quadruple therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg given twice daily for 7 days); 82 standard triple therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg given twice daily) for 7 days and 83 standard triple therapy for 10 days. The efficacies were examined at Week 4 post-therapy by (13)C-urea breath test. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was recorded.ResultsAmong them, 242 patients completed the follow-up. The eradication rates for non-bismuth quadruple therapy and standard triple therapy for 7 or 10 days were 91.4% (74/81), 79.3% (65/82) and 79.5% (66/83) as determined by intention-to-treat analysis (ITT). The eradication rates were 92.5% (74/80), 81.3% (65/80) and 80.5% (66/82) respectively as determined by per-protocol analysis (PP).Non-bismuth quadruple therapy was superior to standard triple therapy for 7 days (ITT analysis P = 0.029, PP analysis P = 0.035) and 10 days (ITT analysis P = 0.032, PP analysis P = 0.026). The differences for the eradication rates between standard triple therapy for 7 days and for 10 days were insignificant (ITT analysis P = 0.968, PP analysis P = 0.902): Adverse reaction rates for non-bismuth quadruple therapy (8.8%, 7/80) and standard triple therapy for 7 days (7.5%, 6/80) and 10 days (9.8%, 8/82) were not significantly different (P = 0.872).ConclusionNon-bismuth quadruple therapy for 7 days is both effective and safe for the first-line eradication of H.pylori.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…