• Matthew J Carr, Jayraan Badiee, Derek A Benham, Joseph A Diaz, Richard Y Calvo, Carol B Sise, Matthew J Martin, and Vishal Bansal.
• Trauma Service (MER62), Scripps Mercy Hospital, 4077 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb 1; 48 (1): 107-112.

BackgroundThe relationship between surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) and hospital teaching status is not well known. We sought to elucidate the association between hospital teaching status and clinical metrics for ASBO.MethodsUsing the 2007-2017 California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database, we identified adult ASBO patients hospitalized for surgical intervention. Hospital teaching status was categorized as major teaching (MajT), minor teaching (MinT), and non-teaching (NT). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate risk of death and other adverse outcomes.ResultsOf 25,047 admissions, 15.4% were at MajT, 32.0% at MinT, and 52.6% at NT; 2.9% died. Patients at MajT had longer overall hospital stays (HLOS) than those at MinT or NT (median days 9 vs. 8 vs. 8; p = 0.005), longer post-ASBO procedure HLOS (median days 7 vs. 6 vs. 6; p = 0.0001) and higher rates of small bowel resection (27.1% vs. 21.7% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.0001). Mean time to first surgery at MajT was 3.3 days compared with 2.6 days (p = 0.004) at MinT and NT. Compared with patients at NT, those at MajT were significantly less likely to die (HR 0.62, p < 0.0001), develop pneumonia (HR 0.57, p = 0.001), or experience adverse discharge disposition (HR 0.79, p < 0.0001).ConclusionMortality and morbidity of ASBO surgery were reduced at MajT; however, time to surgery, HLOS, and rate of small bowel resection were greater. These findings may guide improvements in the management of ASBO patients.© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

16 keywords...

hide…