• Bernard F Vanacker, Karel M Vermeyen, Michel M R F Struys, Henk Rietbergen, Eugene Vandermeersch, Vera Saldien, Alain F Kalmar, and Martine E Prins.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. bernard.vanacker@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
• Anesth. Analg. 2007 Mar 1;104(3):563-8.

AbstractIn this study we investigated whether the novel reversal drug, sugammadex, is equally effective at reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block (NMB) in patients under propofol or sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. After receiving propofol for induction, patients were randomized to propofol (n = 21) or sevoflurane (n = 21). Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered for tracheal intubation. NMB was monitored using acceleromyography. At reappearance of the second twitch of the train-of-four ratio, sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg was administered by IV bolus. The primary end-point was time from start of sugammadex administration to recovery of train-of-four ratio to 0.9. Mean recovery time was 1.8 min after both propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in recovery time between the 2 groups (-0.5 to +0.4 min) was well within the predefined equivalence interval (-1 to +1 min), indicating that recovery from NMB was unaffected by maintenance anesthesia. Thirteen patients (propofol n = 4; sevoflurane n = 9) experienced adverse events; these were treatment-related in 4 patients (propofol n = 3; sevoflurane n = 1). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events and no discontinuations or deaths. No residual paralysis occurred. The safety profile of sugammadex was somewhat more favorable under propofol than under sevoflurane anesthesia.

29 keywords...

hide…