• Military medicine · May 2023

    Review

    Mental Health Stigma in Department of Defense Policies: Analysis, Recommendations, and Outcomes.

    • Marjorie Campbell, Jennifer L Auchterlonie, Zoe Andris, Denise C Cooper, and Tim Hoyt.
    • Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
    • Mil Med. 2023 May 16; 188 (5-6): e1171e1177e1171-e1177.

    IntroductionMental health stigma is one of the most frequently reported barriers to mental health help-seeking in the military. Previous research has identified that stigma-increasing language in the United States military policies was a potential deterrent to treatment-seeking. In response to a 2016 Government Accountability Office report recommendation, the current study conducted a comprehensive review of Department of Defense and military service-specific policies to identify stigmatizing language provisions and recommend appropriate language changes.MethodsThis review of policies comprised three sequential phases. First, a key-term search strategy was conducted on mental health (Phase 1) and substance misuse policies (Phase 2) to identify language that may contribute to stigma. Recommended language changes were identified, and the results of each phase were briefed to service-level Directors of Psychological Health. Approximately three years after initial identification, all mental health policies from Phase 1 for which language change recommendations had been made were examined to determine whether or not recommended changes had been incorporated (Phase 3).ResultsOut of 285 mental health and substance misuse policies, 191 (67%) contained potentially stigmatizing language. Subsequent review of implementation showed that partial or full recommended language changes had been made in 58.9% of 129 mental health-related policies that had been re-issued.ConclusionsThis collaborative effort to identify and modify potentially stigmatizing language contributed to a substantial reduction in problematic policies across the military services. Future efforts should focus on reviewing new and re-issued policies to ensure that stigma-increasing language is not present as part of routine issuance. These efforts are part of ongoing work to address the association that language and terminology have on stigma and barriers to care.Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…