• Siyi Tao, Chaojie Liu, Qunhong Wu, Juan Zhao, Yuxin Xue, Weijian Song, Minglei Sun, Chen Wang, Dandan Zou, Wei Liu, Yanhua Hao, Mingli Jiao, Hong Sun, Ye Li, Linghan Shan, and Libo Liang.
• Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
• Fam Pract. 2022 May 28; 39 (3): 527-536.

ObjectivesThe doctor-patient relationship is usually measured in line with patient needs and demands. This study aimed to develop a scale measuring such a relationship from the perspective of doctors.MethodsA draft scale was developed and adapted to the hospital context of China based on several existing scales, with an intention to measure how medical doctors view and manage their relationship with patients beyond episodic clinical encounters. Two rounds of Delphi consultations involving 14 experts were conducted to seek their consensus on the inclusion and descriptions of items. This resulted in a 19-item scale measuring four domains of the relationship. The scale was validated through a survey of 1,712 medical doctors selected from 27 public hospitals in Heilongjiang province of China. The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficients of the four domains. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the construct validity of the scale. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess the known-group validity of the scale.ResultsThe scale measures four domains. The Cronbach's α of the scale reached an acceptable level, ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 for its four domains. Good fitness of data into the four-domain structure of the scale was confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis. Known-group differences were demonstrated in the regression analyses.ConclusionThe doctor-patient relationship scale developed in this study is a psychometrically valid tool assessing how medical doctors view and manage their relationship with patients in the hospital setting in China.© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

13 keywords...

hide…