• Toshihiro Ogiwara, Alhusain Nagm, Takatoshi Hasegawa, Yoshiki Hanaoka, Shunsuke Ichinose, Tetsuya Goto, and Kazuhiro Hongo.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan. togiwara@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
• Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Sep 1; 42 (3): 683-689.

AbstractVarious skull base reconstruction techniques have been developed in endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base lesions to prevent postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and pitfalls of our method of skull base reconstruction after EEA. A total of 123 patients who underwent EEA (127 surgeries) between October 2014 and May 2017 were reviewed. Our algorithm for skull base reconstruction in EEA was categorized based on intraoperative CSF leakage graded as follows: grade 0 was excluded from this study; grade 1, dural suturing with abdominal fat graft or packing of gelatin sponge into the cavity; grade 2, method for grade 1 with addition of mucosal flap or nasoseptal flap (NSF); and grade 3, duraplasty in fascia patchwork closure with NSF. Bony reconstruction was not mandatory, and there was no postoperative bed rest or initial lumbar drainage (LD) insertion in any of the cases. Postoperative CSF leakage after EEA was mostly prevented (96.3%) by our algorithm without postoperative initial LD or bed rest. On the other hand, reconstruction surgery was required for postoperative CSF leakage in two cases-one with prior multitranssphenoidal surgery and radiotherapy and another patient with poor compliance due to communication difficulties. Both of the latter patients were obese. Greater care with regard to postoperative CSF leakage is required in patients with prior EEA with radiotherapy and obesity. In such high-risk patients, initial LD or bed rest may be required to prevent postoperative CSF leakage. It is also important to restrict activities that result in increased intracranial pressure.

40 keywords...

hide…