• Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss · May 1988

    [Cardiac stimulation in children. 20 years' experience].

    • B Dodinot, F Marçon, B Mouna, F Ribeiro-Lages, J P Godenir, and C Pernot.
    • Clinique des maladies cardiovasculaires, CHU de Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy.
    • Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1988 May 1; 81 (5): 673-83.

    AbstractBetween July, 1967 and December, 1987, 71 children and adolescents (43 boys, 28 girls) aged from 9 days to 20 years (mean 7.8 years) underwent pacemaker implantation. In 91 p. 100 of the cases this treatment was performed for complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). Surgical CAVB was the reason for 59 p. 100 of implantations (correction of tetralogy of Fallot and, more recently, of complex cardiopathies), the second main reason (16.9 p. 100) being nonsurgical CAVB associated with heart disease; the children in this group were young (mean age 4.2 years), and the prognosis mainly depended on the heart disease. Isolated congenital CAVB accounted for only 8.5 p. 100 of pacemaker implantations; these were older children (mean age 13.7 years), and the decision to implant was often difficult to reach in the absence of major functional disorders; following implantation, it was frequently found that isolated congenital CAVBs regarded as being well tolerated in fact were unrecognized handicaps. Acquired CAVB (7 p. 100) mostly consisted of Kearns' syndrome (4/5 cases). In addition, 3 children with sinus node disease and 1 with Romano-Ward syndrome benefited from cardiac pacing. Seven children died; death was in no case due to pacing but to the heart disease associated with CAVB. Endocardial pacing (68.2 p. 100 of primary implantations during the last decade) was preferred to epicardial pacing. Since 1985 we have been using exclusively screwed endocardial monopolar electrodes. The pacemakers were usually of the single-chamber ventricular type (85.9 p. 100 of primary implantations), but since 1987 dual-chamber pacemakers have been increasingly preferred for children with permanent CAVB or for replacement of pacemaker cases. Single-chamber noncompetitive ("demand") pacemakers were implanted in only 2 children: one pacemaker was connected to a ventricular electrode (atrial paralysis), the other to an atrial electrode. Whatever the type of electrode used, the pacemakers were implanted in the abdominal region in very young infants and in the pectoral region in children older than 3 or 4 years. Breakage of the wire was the main complication. Rises in threshold are the major drawback of epicardial pacing, as they require reoperation when the energy delivered cannot be effectively programmed. Endocardial pacing, preferably with a dual-chamber instrument, seems to be the best method, being the least aggressive, with minimal complications in short and very long term; it is justified as first-line treatment of permanent or predominant CAVB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.