• Julie Bouquier, Cyrille Huchon, Pierre Panel, and Arnaud Fauconnier.
• From the *INSERM, UMR S953, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's and Children's Health, Paris, France, †Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain, Research Unit EA 7285 "Risk and safety in clinical medicine for women and perinatal health," University of Versailles Saint-Quentin (UVSQ), Poissy, France; and ‡Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier André Mignot', Versailles, France.
• Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Sep 1; 41 (9): 525-31.

BackgroundPelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is often responsible for acute pelvic pain, yet its clinical diagnosis is difficult. The aim of this study was to develop and validate prediction rules for the diagnosis of PID in patients seen for acute pelvic pain, based solely on a self-assessed questionnaire.MethodsFrom September 2006 to April 2008, 499 consecutive patients presenting at the gynecology emergency departments of 5 hospitals for acute pelvic pain completed a Self-Assessment Questionnaire for Gynecological Emergencies. Seventy-three were identified as having a PID. Two-thirds of the database was randomly selected for the derivation of the prediction rules, and the other third was used for internal validation. We developed 2 scores, one that rules out a diagnosis of PID and one that predicts PID, based on multiple logistic regression with jackknife estimates. These scores were then validated with the validation data set.ResultsFour variables were independently associated with PID: scattered pain radiation and/or diffuse pain, insidious pain, peritoneal irritation, and abnormal vaginal discharge. They were used to create a sensitive prediction model that rules out PID. Four other variables were used to build another model that predicted PID with high specificity: abnormal vaginal discharge, bilateral pelvic pain, constipation, and presence of an intrauterine device. The probability of PID for the patients in the low-risk group was 1.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.03-5.8), and the probability of PID in the high-risk group was 55% (95% confidence interval, 31.5-76.9).ConclusionThese 2 prediction rules that classify patients in low risk or high risk of PID, based on simple items collected by a self-assessed questionnaire that are composed only of case history and autodescription of the pain, may prove useful for diagnosing or ruling out PID in patients with acute pelvic pain.

25 keywords...

hide…