-
Review Meta Analysis
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Feng Gao, Hongyu Chu, Jianjun Li, Mingliang Yang, Liangjie DU, Jun Li, Liang Chen, Degang Yang, Hong Zhang, and Chetwyn Chan.
- Center for Neural Injury and Repair, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.
- J Neurosurg Sci. 2017 Oct 1; 61 (5): 514-522.
IntroductionThe evidence regarding efficiency of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on relief of neuropathic pain (NP) in patients with prior spinal cord injury (SCI) is controversial. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of rTMS in pain relieve in patients suffering from SCI associated NP.Evidence AcquisitionMedline, PubMed, Cochrane Database, EMBASE, Google Scholar databases were searched for clinical studies on effects of rTMS treatment on NP caused by prior SCI published before March 14th, 2016 with various combinations of following key words: "transcranial magnetic stimulation," "spinal injury," "pain." Standardized difference in means with 95% confidence interval was calculated for the change of pain scores after rTMS or sham rTMS treatments.Evidence SynthesisA total of two randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and 4 crossover RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis. The RCTs recruited a total of 27 patients. The crossover RCTs recruited a total of 100 patients. The combined standardized difference in means indicated that patients who received rTMS intervention had better pain relief than those who received sham rTMS intervention, however, the results did not reach statistical significance (standardized mean difference -0.607, 95% CI: -1.29 to 0.075, P=0.081).ConclusionsrTMS might reduce SCI associated neuropathic pain; however, further studies are required to support our conclusions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.