• Amir Aminlari, Jennifer Stone, Ryan McKee, Rachna Subramony, Adam Nadolski, Vaishal Tolia, and Stephen R Hayden.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
• J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 1; 61 (5): 558-567.

BackgroundAchilles tendon rupture is a common injury with increasing incidence due to the rising popularity of high-velocity sports, continued physical activity of the aging American population, and use of fluoroquinolones and steroid injections. The diagnosis can often be missed or delayed, with up to 20% misdiagnosed, most commonly as an ankle sprain.ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to systematically evaluate the reported sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of ultrasound for detecting Achilles tendon rupture in patients who were treated surgically.MethodsIn January 2020, we performed a literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify eligible articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria were original studies with at least five patients, which reported data on the sonographic diagnosis of Achilles tendon rupture (complete or partial) compared to surgery as the reference standard.ResultsA total of 15 studies with 808 patients were included in the primary analysis. The sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting complete Achilles tendon ruptures was 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.3-97.2%), specificity was 98.7% (95% CI 97.0-99.6%), positive likelihood ratio was 74.0 (95% CI 31.0-176.8), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.09), in patients who underwent surgical treatment.ConclusionsThe results from our study suggested that a negative ultrasound result may have the potential to rule out a complete, as well as a partial, Achilles tendon rupture.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…