• Juan Flores, Francisco Del Olmo, Jesse Aleman, Yomayra Otero, and William Rodríguez-Cintrón.
• VA Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
• P R Health Sci J. 2019 Mar 1; 38 (1): 8-14.

ObjectiveSevere sepsis and Septic Shock may progress in the first hours after presentation and has been associated with an increased mortality. Prompt recognition and treatment of early septic shock (ESS) may improve survival. The purpose of our study was to describe the monitoring and management strategies of ESS, within Intensive Care Units (ICU) in Puerto Rico (PR).MethodsIn order to achieve our objective, a self-administered survey, previously validated by the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, was administered to 25 physicians during a Critical Care Medicine (CCM) Meeting. Questions about usual monitoring and resuscitation end-points were administered.ResultsMost of the participants were affiliated to community hospitals (84%) and 92% were pulmonary or CCM specialists, with more than 15 years of working experience (80%). Monitoring devices and parameters mostly used by at least 85% of the respondents were: Oxygen Saturation, Foley catheters, Telemetry, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, and Urinary Output. Intra-arterial lines and Central Venous Pressure were less used. Most use normal saline (96%), as the initial fluid of resuscitation. Only 24% would use inotropes to improve perfusion.ConclusionSignificant variability exists in the management of ESS among physicians in the ICU in PR. Compared to other studies, fewer physicians in PR use invasive monitoring techniques. These results highlight the need for quality education and training in CCM as well as continuing education in the field.

21 keywords...

hide…