• C K Stone, A Stimson, S H Thomas, W G Hume, R Hunt, H Cassell, S Brinkley, and D Bryan-Berge.
• University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40517, USA.
• Air Med. J. 1995 Oct 1; 14 (4): 219-21.

PurposePrevious research has confirmed the inability of flight nurses in an airborne BO-105 helicopter to hear breath sounds using normal or amplified transthoracic stethoscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether esophageal stethoscopy enabled effective auscultation of breath sounds in a simulated in-flight environment.MethodsThe cabin-sound environment of an in-flight BO-105 was recorded and recreated in an audiology laboratory, where five flight nurses were evaluated listening to taped breath sounds via an esophageal stethoscope. This audiotape model, validated in a previously published study, used a tape consisting of 24 20-second segments. Each segment, the beginning of which was marked with a beep signal, consisted of 20 seconds of silence or breath sounds. The distal (esophageal) end of the esophageal stethoscope was attached to the tape recorder; the intensity level of breath sounds heard at the stethoscope earpiece was calibrated to equate the sound level of actual esophageal breath sounds recorded on a volunteer.ResultsAll nurses correctly identified the 24 taped segments as silent or including breath sounds 100% of the time.ConclusionIn the simulated environment tested, esophageal stethoscopy enabled 100% accuracy in identification of breath sounds, as compared with previously reported 0% efficacy for standard transthoracic auscultation. Study in the actual patient-care environment is indicated to confirm the usefulness of esophageal stethoscopy in the in-flight setting.

16 keywords...

hide…