-
Observational Study
To Compare the Efficacy of Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Post-Extubation Period in VLBW Infants.
- Bhawan Deep Garg, Naveen Bajaj, and Deepak Sharma.
- Deep hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
- J. Trop. Pediatr. 2018 Aug 1; 64 (4): 262-266.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) as noninvasive respiratory support in post-extubation period in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.MethodThis retrospective study enrolled 136 neonates, ≤32 weeks gestation and ≤1500 grams birth weight, requiring noninvasive respiratory support during post-extubation period.ResultsThere was no significant difference in post-extubation failure in HHHFNC group when compared with CPAP group (p > 0.05) but post-extubation complication was significantly higher in CPAP group (p < 0.05) including nasal septal trauma and pneumothorax.ConclusionsIn neonates ≤32 weeks of gestational age, HHHFNC showed similar efficacy, and better safety profile than nasal-CPAP when used during post-extubation period for respiratory support.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.