• Melissa A Bright, Lawrence Kleinman, Bruce Vogel, and Elizabeth Shenkman.
• Institute for Child Health Policy, Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. Electronic address: mbright@coe.ufl.edu.
• Acad Pediatr. 2018 May 1; 18 (4): 397-404.

ObjectiveTo examine the rate of access to primary and preventive care and emergency department (ED) reliance for foster youth as well as the impact of a transition from fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid to managed care (MC) on this access.MethodsSecondary administrative data were obtained from Medicaid programs in one state that transitioned foster youth from an FFS to an MC (Texas) and another state, comparable in population size and racial/ethnic diversity, which continuously enrolled foster youth in an FFS system (Florida). Eligible participants were foster youth (aged 0-18 years) enrolled in these states between 2006 and 2010 (n = 126,714). A Puhani approach to difference-in-difference was used to identify the effect of transition after adjusting for race/ethnicity, gender, and health status. Data were used to calculate access to primary and preventive care as well as ED reliance. ED reliance was operationalized as the number of ED visits relative to the number of total ambulatory visits; high ED reliance was defined as ≥33%.ResultsThe transition to MC was associated with a 6% to 13% increase in access to primary care. Preventive care visits were 10% to 13% higher among foster youth in MC compared to those in FFS. ED reliance declined for the intervention group but to a lesser extent than did the control group, yielding a positive mean percentage change.ConclusionsFoster youth access to care may benefit from a Medicaid MC delivery system, particularly as the plans used are designed with the unique needs of this vulnerable population.Copyright © 2018 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…