• Benoît Bataille, David Le Moal, Thomas Renault, Pierre Cocquet, Jade de Selle, and Stein Silva.
• Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Narbonne, Bd Dr Lacroix, 11100, Narbonne, France. b_bataille2@yahoo.fr.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Oct 1; 36 (5): 1479-1487.

AbstractThe accuracy of pulse pressure variation (PPV) to predict fluid responsiveness using pressure-controlled (PC) instead of volume-controlled modes is under debate. To specifically address this issue, we designed a study to evaluate the accuracy of PPV to predict fluid responsiveness in severe septic patients who were mechanically ventilated with biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) PC-ventilation mode. 45 patients with sepsis or septic shock and who were mechanically ventilated with BIPAP mode and a target tidal volume of 7-8 ml/kg were included. PPV was automatically assessed at baseline and after a standard fluid challenge (Ringer's lactate 500 ml). A 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) defined fluid responsiveness. The predictive value of PPV was evaluated through a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and "gray zone" statistical approach. 20 (44%) patients were considered fluid responders. We identified a significant relationship between PPV decrease after volume expansion and SV increase (spearman ρ = - 0.5, p < 0.001). The area under ROC curve for PPV was 0.71 (95%CI 0.56-0.87, p = 0.007). The best cut-off (based on Youden's index) was 8%, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 60%. Using a gray zone approach, we identified that PPV values comprised between 5 and 15% do not allow a reliable fluid responsiveness prediction. In critically ill septic patients ventilated under BIPAP mode, PPV appears to be an accurate method for fluid responsiveness prediction. However, PPV values comprised between 5 and 15% constitute a gray zone that does not allow a reliable fluid responsiveness prediction.© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

18 keywords...

hide…