• Claire S Burton, Gabriela Gonzalez, Eunice Choi, Catherine Bresee, Teryl K Nuckols, Karyn S Eilber, Neil S Wenger, and Jennifer T Anger.
• Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
• Am. J. Med. 2022 Apr 1; 135 (4): 524530.e1524-530.e1.

BackgroundAlthough specialists are skilled in the management of urinary incontinence, primary care clinicians are integral in early diagnosis and initiation of management in order to decrease overuse of specialty care and improve the quality of specialist visits. We measured the quality of incontinence care provided by primary care clinicians prior to referral to a specialist and evaluated the impact of provider variables on quality of care.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 200 women referred for urinary incontinence to a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery specialist between March 2017 and July 2018. We measured primary care adherence to 12 quality indicators in the 12 months prior to specialist consultation. We stratified adherence to quality indicators by clinician sex and years of experience.ResultsHalf of women with incontinence underwent a pelvic examination or had a urinalysis ordered. Few patients with urge urinary incontinence were recommended behavioral therapy (14%) or prescribed medication (8%). When total aggregate scores were compared, female clinicians performed the recommended care 47% ± 25% of the time, compared with 35% ± 23% for male clinicians (P = .003). Increasing years of experience was associated with worse overall urinary incontinence care (r -0.157, P = .02).ConclusionsWe found low rates of adherence to a set of quality indicators for women with urinary incontinence, with male clinicians performing significantly worse than female clinicians. Improvement of incontinence care in primary care could significantly reduce costs of care and preserve outcomes.Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

9 keywords...

hide…