• K O'Hearn, S Gertsman, R Webster, A Tsampalieros, R Ng, J Gibson, M Sampson, L Sikora, and J D McNally.
• Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: kohearn@cheo.on.ca.
• J. Hosp. Infect. 2020 Nov 1; 106 (3): 504-521.

BackgroundDecontaminating and reusing filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) for healthcare workers is a potential solution to address inadequate FFR supply during a global pandemic.AimThe objective of this review was to synthesize existing data on the effectiveness and safety of using chemical disinfectants to decontaminate N95 FFRs.MethodsA systematic review was conducted on disinfectants to decontaminate N95 FFRs using Embase, Medline, Global Health, Google Scholar, WHO feed, and MedRxiv. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility and extracted predefined data fields. Original research reporting on N95 FFR function, decontamination, safety, or FFR fit following decontamination with a disinfectant was included.Findings And ConclusionA single cycle of vaporized hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) successfully removes viral pathogens without affecting airflow resistance or fit, and maintains an initial filter penetration of <5%, with little change in FFR appearance. Residual hydrogen peroxide levels following decontamination were within safe limits. More than one decontamination cycle of vaporized H2O2 may be possible but further information is required on how multiple cycles would affect FFR fit in a real-world setting before the upper limit can be established. Although immersion in liquid H2O2 does not appear to adversely affect FFR function, there is no available data on its ability to remove infectious pathogens from FFRs or its impact on FFR fit. Sodium hypochlorite, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, and ethylene oxide are not recommended due to safety concerns or negative effects on FFR function.Copyright © 2020 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…