-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Comparison of a Hemostatic Powder and Standard Treatment in the Control of Active Bleeding From Upper Nonvariceal Lesions : A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Trial.
- LauJames Y WJYW0000-0003-0122-4068Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (J.Y.L., R.S.T., H.C., B.S., F.K.C.)., Rapat Pittayanon, Andrew Kwek, Raymond S Tang, Heyson Chan, Rungsun Rerknimitr, June Lee, Tiing Leong Ang, Bing-Yee Suen, Yuan-Yuan Yu, ChanFrancis K LFKL0000-0001-7388-2436Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (J.Y.L., R.S.T., H.C., B.S., F.K.C.)., and SungJoseph J YJJY0000-0003-3125-5199Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (J.J.S.)..
- Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (J.Y.L., R.S.T., H.C., B.S., F.K.C.).
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2022 Feb 1; 175 (2): 171-178.
BackgroundThe effectiveness of the hemostatic powder TC-325 as a single endoscopic treatment for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare TC-325 with standard endoscopic hemostatic treatments in the control of active bleeding from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal causes.DesignOne-sided, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02534571).SettingUniversity teaching hospitals in the Asia-Pacific region.Patients224 adult patients with acute bleeding from a nonvariceal cause on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.InterventionTC-325 (n = 111) or standard hemostatic treatment (n = 113).MeasurementsThe primary outcome was control of bleeding within 30 days. Other outcomes included failure to control bleeding during index endoscopy, recurrent bleeding after initial hemostasis, further interventions, blood transfusion, hospitalization, and death.Results224 patients were enrolled (136 with gastroduodenal ulcers [60.7%], 33 with tumors [14.7%], and 55 with other causes of bleeding [24.6%]). Bleeding was controlled within 30 days in 100 of 111 patients (90.1%) in the TC-325 group and 92 of 113 (81.4%) in the standard treatment group (risk difference, 8.7 percentage points [1-sided 95% CI, 0.95 percentage point]). There were fewer failures of hemostasis during index endoscopy with TC-325 (3 [2.7%] vs. 11 [9.7%]; odds ratio, 0.26 [CI, 0.07 to 0.95]). Recurrent bleeding within 30 days did not differ between groups (9 [8.1%] vs. 10 [8.8%]). The need for further interventions also did not differ between groups (further endoscopic treatment: 8 [7.2%] vs. 10 [8.8%]; angiography: 2 [1.8%] vs. 4 [3.5%]; surgery: 1 [0.9%] vs. 0). There were 14 deaths in each group (12.6% vs. 12.4%).LimitationClinicians were not blinded to treatment.ConclusionTC-325 is not inferior to standard treatment in the endoscopic control of bleeding from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal causes.Primary Funding SourceGeneral Research Fund to the University Grants Committee, Hong Kong SAR Government.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.