-
- Gregory D Schroeder, Brian A Karamian, Jose A Canseco, Luiz R Vialle, Frank Kandziora, Lorin M Benneker, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Jörg H Holstein, Klaus J Schnake, Mark F Kurd, Marcel F Dvorak, Emiliano N Vialle, Andrei F Joaquim, Rishi M Kanna, Michael Fehlings, Jefferson R Wilson, Jens R Chapman, James C Krieg, Conor P Kleweno, Reza Firoozabadi, F Cumhur Öner, Christopher K Kepler, and Alexander R Vaccaro.
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
- J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Dec 1; 35 (12): e496-e501.
ObjectivesTo (1) demonstrate that the AO Spine Sacral Classification System can be reliably applied by general orthopaedic surgeons and subspecialists universally around the world and (2) delineate those injury subtypes that are most difficult to classify reliably to refine the classification before evaluating clinical outcomes.DesignAgreement study.SettingAll-level trauma centers, worldwide.ParticipantsOne hundred seventy-two members of the AO Trauma and AO Spine community.InterventionThe AO Sacral Classification System was applied by each surgeon to 26 cases in 2 independent assessments performed 3 weeks apart.Main Outcome MeasurementsInterobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.ResultsA total of 8097 case assessments were performed. The kappa coefficient for interobserver agreement for all cases was 0.72/0.75 (assessment 1/assessment 2), representing substantial reliability. When comparing classification grading (A/B/C) regardless of subtype, the kappa coefficient was 0.84/0.85, corresponding to excellent reliability. The kappa coefficients for interobserver reliability were 0.95/0.93 for type A fractures, 0.78/0.79 for type B fractures, and 0.80/0.83 for type C fractures. The overall kappa statistic for intraobserver reliability was 0.82 (range 0.18-1.00), representing excellent reproducibility. When only evaluating morphology type (A/B/C), the average kappa value was 0.87 (range 0.18-1.00), representing excellent reproducibility.ConclusionThe AO Spine Sacral Classification System is universally reliable among general orthopaedic surgeons and subspecialists worldwide, with substantial interobserver and excellent intraobserver reliability.Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.