• Gustavo Plaza-Manzano, Marcos J Navarro-Santana, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Raúl Fabero-Garrido, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, and Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva.
• Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
• Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2022 May 1; 52 (5): e13728.

BackgroundPrevious evidence showed altered lumbar multifidus (LM) activation in populations with chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP). We aimed to investigate the test-retest and inter-examiner reliability of ultrasound imaging (US) for assessing LM thickness at rest and activation during the active straight leg raise test (ASLR) and the association between thickness changes with clinical outcomes.MethodsFifty-two patients with LBP and two examiners (one experienced and one novice) participated in this study. A total of 18 B-mode images at L4-L5 or L5-S1 level (both sides, 3 at rest and 6 during ASLR) were collected. For assessing test-retest reliability, the experienced examiner repeated the procedure after 7 days. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurements (SEM) and minimal detectable changes (MDC) were calculated.ResultsInter-examiner agreement was good to excellent (ICC3,2 = 0.71-0.92) and test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC3,1 = 0.91-0.98). Mean average of multiple measurements improved the agreement. Greater LM thickness at rest (p < .05) and greater thickness change after 3 s (p < .01) and 10 s (homolateral side, p < .01; contralateral side, p < .05) were associated with less pain intensity.ConclusionsUS is a reliable method to assess the LM thickness at rest and contracted during the ASLR in patients with LBP. The measurement at 3 s after maintaining ASLR, as well as the use of the mean of three measurements, has been shown to be the most reliable method for measuring LM muscle thickness during ASLR.© 2021 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

16 keywords...

hide…