• Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech · Jan 2016

    [Injury to the Scapholunate Ligament in Distal Radius Fractures: Peri-Operative Diagnosis and Treatment Results].

    • R Gajdoš, J Pilný, and A Pokorná.
    • II. klinika úrazovej chirurgie, Slovenská zdravotnická univerzita, Fakultná nemocnica s poliklinikou F. D. Roosevelta, Banská Bystrica.
    • Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016 Jan 1; 83 (5): 336-343.

    AbstractPURPOSE OF THE STUDY Injury to the scapholunate ligament is frequently associated with a fracture of the distal radius. At present neither a unified concept of treatment nor a standard method of diagnosis in these concomitant injuries is available. The aim of the study was to evaluate a group of surgically treated patients with distal radius fractures in order to assess a contribution of combined conventional X-ray and intra-operative fluoroscopic examinations to the diagnosis of associated lesions and to compare short-term functional outcomes of sugically treated patients with those of patients treated conservatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS A group of patients undergoiong surgery for distal radius fractures using plate osteosynthesis was evaluated retrospectively. The peri-operative diagnosis of associated injury to the scapholunate ligament was based on pre-operative standard X-ray views and intra-operative fluoroscopy. The latter consisted of images of maximum radial and ulnar deviation as well as an image of the forearm in traction exerted manually along the long axis. All views were in postero-anterior projection. Results were read directly on the monitor of a fluoroscopic device after its calibration or were obtained by comparing the thickness of an attached Kirschner wire with the distance to be measured. Subsequently, pixels were converted to millimetres. When a scapholunate ligament injury was found and confirmed by examination of the contralateral wrist, the finding was verified by open reduction or arthroscopy. Both static and dynamic instabilities were treated together with the distal radius fracture at one-stage surgery. After surgery, the patients without ligament injury had the wrist immobilised for 4 weeks, then rehabilitation followed. In the patients with a damaged ligament, immobilisation in a short brace lasted until transarticular wires were removed. All patients were followed up for a year at least. At follow-up, the injured wrist was examined for signs of clinical instability of the scapholunate joint, functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Wrist Score (MWS) and pain intensity was evaluated on the Visual Analoque Scale (VAS). Restriction in daily activities was rated by the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) score and plain X-ray was done. If any of the results was not satisfactory, MRI examination was indicated. RESULTS Of a total of 265 patients, 35 had injury to the scapholunate joint, 16 had static instability diagnosed by a standard fluoroscopic examination and nine patients with an acute phase of injury remained undiagnosed. For detection of associated scapholunate injuries, a standard X-ray examination had sensitivity of 46%, specificity of 99%, accuracy of 92%, positive predictive value of 84%, negative predictive value of 92%, positive likelihood ratio = 35.05 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.55. Dynamic fluoroscopic examination showed sensitivity of 53%, specificity of 99%, accuracy of 95%, positive predictive value of 77%, negative predictive value of 96%, positive likelihood ratio = 36.49 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.48. Using the MWS system, no differences in the outcome of scapholunate instability treatment were found between the patients undergoing surgery and those treated conservatively (p=0.35). Statistically significant differences were detected in the evaluation of subjective parameters - both VAS and QDASH scores were better in the treated than non-treated patients (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). DISCUSSION The high negative predictive values of both standard X-ray and intra-operative fluoroscopy showed that combined use of the two method is more relevant for excluding than for confirming an injury to the scapholunate ligament concomitant with distal radius fracture. Similarly, the low negative likelihood ratio showed that a negative result decreases the pre-test probability of concomitant injury. CONCLUSIONS Negative findings of scapholunate ligament injury on standard X-ray views and intra-operative fluoroscopic images make it unnecessary to perform any further intra-operative examination to detect injury to the scapholunate ligament. Positive findings require verification of the degree of injury by another intra-operative modality, most ideally by arthroscopy. Patients with untreated instability associated with distal radius fracture have, at short-term follow-up, no statistically significant differences in functioning of the injured extremity in comparison with treated patients. Subjectively, however, they feel more pain and more restriction in performing daily activities. Therefore, the treatment of an injured scapholunate ligament together with distal radius fracture at one-stage surgery seems to be a good alternative for the patient. Key words: distal radius fractures, scapholunate ligament, radiographic, diagnosis, outcome distal radius fracture.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…