• J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. · May 2020

    Measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire item banks in adults with atopic dermatitis.

    • Jonathan I Silverberg, Jin-Shei Lai, Paras P Vakharia, Kevin Patel, Vivek Singam, Rishi Chopra, Ryan Sacotte, Neha Patel, Supriya Rastogi, Robert Kantor, Derek Y Hsu, and David Cella.
    • Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Northwestern Medicine Multidisciplinary Eczema Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC. Electronic address: JonathanISilverberg@gmail.com.
    • J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020 May 1; 82 (5): 1174-1180.

    BackgroundThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Itch Questionnaire (PIQ) was recently developed.ObjectiveTo validate PIQ short forms in adults with AD.MethodsSelf-administered questionnaires and skin examinations were performed in 239 adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) in a dermatology practice setting.ResultsPIQ items had good content validity. PIQ item bank T-scores strongly correlated with each other, moderately correlated with numeric and verbal rating scales for worst or average itch and with itch frequency, moderately to strongly correlated with patient-oriented eczema measure, and weakly to moderately correlated with the Eczema Area and Severity Index and Objective-Scoring AD (Spearman correlations, P < .0001). There were significant and stepwise increases of T-scores for all item banks with increasing patient-reported global severity (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < .0001). However, there was limited ability to discriminate between the lowest or highest 2 levels of AD or itch severity. Item banks showed good internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.91-0.95). No differential item functioning was identified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, or educational level. There were floor effects for total scores, particularly in almost clear/mild AD or itch.LimitationsSingle-center study.ConclusionsPIQ item bank short forms showed good content and construct validity and are feasible for potential use in clinical trials and practice.Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.