• Jun Li, Xiangguo Shen, Yangyang Geng, Jie Chen, Xingang Shi, Feng Liu, Can Xu, and Zhaoshen Li.
• Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23; 100 (51): e27760e27760.

AbstractLugol's iodine staining (LIS) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) are currently the most common methods applied in demarcating early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCCs) during endoscopic submucosal dissection. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects on clinical outcomes in comparison between LIS and NBI for the demarcation of EESCCs during endoscopic submucosal dissection.This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. A total of 172 patients were involved. 109 patients received demarcation of the lesion by LIS and 63 patients by NBI. Data on baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes and follow-up information were collected for analyses.The mean diameter of the lesions was 3.9 ± 1.5 cm. R0 resection rate was 89.5%. The rate of total and in-hospital adverse events was 25.6% and 9.3%. The cumulative recurrence rate was 2.9% and 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 98.3%. Compared to patients of the LIS group, patients of the NBI group showed significantly shorter procedure time (44.8 ± 32.2 v.s.57.0 ± 40.6, P = .044), lower rate of using of scopolamine butylbromide (19.0% vs 35.8%, P = 0.021), reduced number of clips used (1.3 ± 1.2  vs 1.8 ± 1.5, P = .017) and alleviated discomfort evaluated by visual analog system score after operation (4.7 ± 0.8 vs 5.5 ± 1.0, P < .001). There was no significant difference of R0 resection rate, margin status, adverse events, cumulative recurrence rate and 3-year disease-specific survival rate between the two groups.Demarcation of EESCCs by NBI could achieve comparable accuracy and clinical outcomes with more convenience and safety compared with demarcation by LIS.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

35 keywords...

hide…