• The Laryngoscope · Jul 2020

    Preoperative augmentative and alternative communication enhancement in pediatric tracheostomy.

    • Rachel Santiago, Michelle Howard, Natasha D Dombrowski, Karen Watters, Mark S Volk, Roger Nuss, John M Costello, and Reza Rahbar.
    • Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
    • Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul 1; 130 (7): 1817-1822.

    Objectives/HypothesisDescribe augmentative communication tools and strategies used by pediatric patients referred to inpatient speech-language pathologists prior to tracheostomy placement.Study DesignRetrospective review.MethodsA review of patients who underwent initial tracheostomy placement from 2013-2016 was conducted at a tertiary pediatric center. Eligible patients were those who were referred to a specialized speech-language pathologist prior to the date of the tracheostomy placement to support communication abilities. Patients were identified by surgical procedural and billing codes. Data collected included patient demographics, speech and language disorders, and interventions performed. Chart review and cross analysis of billing data for types of assessment and intervention procedures were conducted by two speech-language pathologists for consensus agreement.ResultsForty-six patients (aged 1 month-27 years, mean = 12.9 years) were included in the study. Average time between the bedside communication assessment and tracheostomy procedure date was 17 days. Baseline speech-language disorders were identified in 11 patients (24%). Thirty-eight (83%) patients were nonspeaking at the time of consultation. Thirty-two (70%) patients utilized an electronic communication tool, and 36 (78%) utilized low-technology communication strategies during the preoperative period. A total of 32 (70%) patients were documented as using no-technology or speech-enhancement strategies during the acute hospitalization.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary tracheostomy teams should consider consultation to speech-language pathologists for patients prior to tracheostomy placement to assess for utility of high-technology, low-technology, and no-technology augmentative and alternative communication strategies.Level Of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 130:1817-1822, 2020.© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.