• European radiology · Apr 2021

    Differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic masses: Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT as a new diagnostic avenue.

    • Venkata Subramanian Krishnaraju, Rajender Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Vishal Sharma, Harjeet Singh, Ritambhra Nada, Amanjit Bal, Manish Rohilla, Harmandeep Singh, and Surinder S Rana.
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
    • Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr 1; 31 (4): 2199-2208.

    ObjectiveDifferentiation of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions on anatomical imaging is difficult in some cases with overlapping features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed during angioneogenesis in many tumors. We aimed to evaluate the PSMA expression in pancreatic lesions to differentiate these lesions and explore the performance of Ga-68 PSMA-PET/CT vis-a-vis F-18 FDG-PET/CT.MethodsPatients with pancreatic lesions on conventional imaging were prospectively recruited. All the patients underwent a whole-body F-18 FDG-PET/CT and a regional abdominal Ga-68 PSMA-PET/CT. Focal tracer uptake (FDG or PSMA) on PET images was considered positive. Histopathology and/or cytopathology were considered the reference standard.ResultsA total of forty patients (27 males, mean age 55.3 ± 9.8, range 37-71 years) were enrolled. Of these, 19 were diagnosed as malignant on histopathology/cytology. Patients with benign lesions showed no worsening of symptoms for at least 6 months on follow-up. FDG-PET/CT revealed 17 true-positive (TP), 9 false-positive (FP), 12 true-negative (TN), and 2 false-negative (FN) findings, whereas PSMA-PET/CT had 18 TP, 2 FP, 19 TN, and 1 FN finding. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for FDG-PET/CT were 89.5%, 57.1%, 65.4%, 85.7%, and 72.5%, respectively, while for PSMA-PET/CT were 94.7%, 90.5%, 90%, 95%, and 92.5%, respectively. ROC curve analysis showed that the SUVmax value of 4.8 on PSMA-PET/CT could predict the malignant potential of a lesion with a specificity of 90.5% and a sensitivity of 84.2%.ConclusionsGa-68 PSMA-PET/CT imaging helped in establishing a non-invasive pre-operative diagnosis of primary pancreatic malignancy with a higher degree of specificity and accuracy compared with FDG-PET/CT.Key Points• Conventional imaging such as CT and MRI are unable to reliably differentiate localized malignant pancreatic lesion from benign lesions mimicking malignancy such as mass-forming pancreatitis. • FDG PET/CT helps in detecting malignant foci in view of their increased glucose metabolism. However, it may be falsely positive in inflammatory lesions which may occasionally hinder its ability to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. • Apart from prostatic malignancy, PSMA is overexpressed in neovasculature of many non-prostatic malignancies. The present study highlights that Ga68 PSMA PET/CT performed better in diagnosing malignancy non-invasively than FDG-PET/CT with a higher PPV (90.5% vs. 65.4%) and accuracy (92.5% vs. 72.5%).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…