• Dtsch Arztebl Int · Feb 2022

    Review

    Collider Bias in Observational Studies: Consequences for Medical Research–Part 30 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications.

    • Thaddäus Tönnies, Sabine Kahl, and Oliver Kuss.
    • German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Institue for Biometrics and Epidemiology, Düsseldorf; German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Insitute for Clinical Diabetology, Düsseldorf; German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf; Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf.
    • Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Feb 18; 119 (7): 107-122.

    BackgroundThe findings of observational studies can be distorted by a number of factors. So-called confounders are well known, but distortion by collider bias (CB) has received little attention in medical research to date. The goal of this article is to present the principle of CB, and measures that can be taken to avoid it, by way of a few illustrative examples.MethodsThe findings of a selective review of the literature on CB are explained with illustrative examples.ResultsThe simplest case of a collider variable is one that is caused by at least two other variables. An example of CB is the observation that, among persons with diabetes, obesity is associated with lower mortality, even though it is associated with higher mortality in the general population. The false protective association between obesity and mortality arises from the restriction of the study population to persons with diabetes.ConclusionCB is a distortion that arises through restriction on or stratification by a collider variable, or through statistical adjustment for a collider variable in a regression model. CB can arise in many ways. The graphic representation of causal structures helps to identify potential sources of CB. It is important to distinguish confounders from colliders, as methods that serve to correct for confounding can themselves cause bias when applied to colliders. There is no generally applicable method for correcting CB.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.