• Birgit Prodinger, Jan D Reinhardt, Melissa Selb, Gerold Stucki, Tiebin Yan, Xia Zhang, and Jianan Li.
• ICF Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research (SPF), Guido A. Zäch Institute, CH-6207 Nottwil, Switzerland . birgit.prodinger@paraplegie.ch.
• J Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun 13; 48 (6): 508-14.

ObjectiveA national, multi-phase, consensus process to develop simple, intuitive descriptions of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories contained in the ICF Generic and Rehabilitation Sets, with the aim of enhancing the utility of the ICF in routine clinical practice, is presented in this study.MethodsA multi-stage, national, consensus process was conducted. The consensus process involved 3 expert groups and consisted of a preparatory phase, a consensus conference with consecutive working groups and 3 voting rounds (votes A, B and C), followed by an implementation phase. In the consensus conference, participants first voted on whether they agreed that an initially developed proposal for simple, intuitive descriptions of an ICF category was in fact simple and intuitive.ResultsThe consensus conference was held in August 2014 in mainland China. Twenty-one people with a background in physical medicine and rehabilitation participated in the consensus process. Four ICF categories achieved consensus in vote A, 16 in vote B, and 8 in vote C.DiscussionThis process can be seen as part of a larger effort towards the system-wide implementation of the ICF in routine clinical and rehabilitation practice to allow for the regular and comprehensive evaluation of health outcomes most relevant for the monitoring of quality of care.

5 keywords...

hide…