• Medicine · Nov 2021

    Clinical efficacy and safety of removing blood stasis and removing phlegm in the treatment of epilepsy with cognitive impairment: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • YangYang Yu, CanXing Yuan, and Chao Gu.
    • Department of Neurology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 24; 100 (47): e27929e27929.

    BackgroundEpilepsy is a chronic encephalopathy caused by abnormal discharge of neurons in the brain, resulting in brain dysfunction. Cognitive impairment is one of the most common complications of epilepsy. The current treatment of epilepsy in the control of symptoms at the same time cause a lot of side effects, especially the aggravation of cognitive impairment. Many literatures have stated that the efficacy and safety of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of epilepsy with cognitive impairment is superior to that of western medicine alone. In this systematic review, we intend to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of removing stasis and resolving phlegm in the treatment of epilepsy with cognitive impairment.MethodsWe will search The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Chinese Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and VIP database. Simultaneously we will retrieval relevant meeting minutes, eligible research reference lists, symposium abstracts, and gray literatures. We will not apply any restrictions to the language and publication date. All randomized controlled trials about the efficacy and safety of removing blood stasis and phlegm in the treatment of epilepsy with cognitive impairment will be included. Two authors will independently carry out. Any objections will be worked out by a third author through consultation. We will use the Revman 5.3 and Stata 13.0 software for data synthesis, sensitivity analysis, meta regression, subgroup analysis, and risk of bias assessment. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation standard will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence.ResultsThis systematic review will synthesize the data from the present eligible high quality randomized controlled trials to assess whether the treatment of removing blood stasis and phlegm is effective and safety for epilepsy with cognitive impairment from various evaluation aspects including clinical efficacy of epilepsy, EEG improvement rate, MOCA score, QOLIE-31 cognitive function score, traditional Chinese medicine symptom score, incidence of adverse reactions, frequency of seizures of epilepsy, and duration of seizure of epilepsy.ConclusionThe systematic review will provide evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of removing blood stasis and phlegm in the treatment of patients with epilepsy with cognitive impairment.Prospero Registration NumberCRD42021224893.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…