• J Pain Symptom Manage · Apr 2022

    Cross Country Comparison of Expert Assessments of the Quality of Death and Dying 2021.

    • Eric A Finkelstein, Afsan Bhadelia, Cynthia Goh, Drishti Baid, Ratna Singh, Sushma Bhatnagar, and Stephen R Connor.
    • Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore and Duke University Global Health Institute (E.A.F.), Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: Eric.finkelstein@duke-nus.edu.sg.
    • J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr 1; 63 (4): e419-e429.

    ContextFew efforts have attempted to quantify how well countries deliver end-of-life (EOL) care.ObjectivesTo score, grade, and rank countries (and Hong Kong and Taiwan) on the quality of EOL care based on assessments from country experts using a novel preference-based scoring algorithm.MethodsWe fielded a survey to country experts around the world, asking them to assess the performance of their country on 13 key indicators of EOL care. Results were combined with preference weights from caregiver-proxies of recently deceased patients to generate a preference-weighted summary score. The scores were then converted to grades (from A-F) and a ranking was created for all included countries.ResultsThe final sample included responses from 181 experts representing 81 countries with 2 or more experts reporting. The 6 countries who received the highest assessment scores and a grade of A were United Kingdom, Ireland, Taiwan, Australia, Republic of Korea, and Costa Rica. Only Costa Rica (upper middle) is not a high income country. Not until Uganda (ranked 31st) does a low-income country appear on the ranking. Based on the assessment scores, twenty-one countries received a failing grade, with only two - Czech Republic (66th), and Portugal (75th) - being high income countries.ConclusionThis study provides an example of how a preference-based scoring algorithm and input from key stakeholders can be used to assess EOL health system performance. Results highlight the large disparities in assessments of the quality of EOL care across countries, and especially between the highest income countries and others.Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.