-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1992
Comparative StudySuperior qualities of University of Wisconsin solution for ex vivo preservation of the pig heart.
- P S Mankad, N J Severs, D R Lachno, S Rothery, and M H Yacoub.
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1992 Aug 1; 104 (2): 229-40.
AbstractThe components of the University of Wisconsin solution have the potential to enhance and extend heart preservation. We have evaluated University of Wisconsin solution by comparing it with St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution in the isolated pig heart subjected to 8 hours of ischemia at 4 degrees C (n = 6 in each). The hearts were perfused ex vivo with enriched autologous blood for the control and the postpreservation assessments. Morphologic, metabolic, and functional evaluations were performed. Left and right ventricular function as assessed by the slope values of systolic and diastolic pressure-volume relationships of isovolumically contracting isolated heart was better preserved by University of Wisconsin solution (percent reduction: left ventricular systolic, 52.4% +/- 5.5% versus 17.7% +/- 6.7% [p less than 0.001]; right ventricular systolic, 125.6% +/- 46.4% versus 65.5% +/- 31.4% [p less than 0.05]; right ventricular diastolic, 112.3% +/- 48.7% versus 40.2% +/- 31.3% [p less than 0.02] after St. Thomas' Hospital and University of Wisconsin preservation, respectively). Postischemic recovery of left ventricular rate of rise of pressure and myocardial oxygen consumption were significantly improved after University of Wisconsin preservation (percent reduction, rate of rise of pressure: St. Thomas' Hospital 39.3% +/- 8.1%; University of Wisconsin 18.1% +/- 4.6%; percent reduction, myocardial oxygen consumption St. Thomas' Hospital 55.1% +/- 6.9%, University of Wisconsin 24.8% +/- 6.7%; p less than 0.001). Microvascular functional integrity as assessed by coronary vascular resistance was well maintained throughout the postischemic period and was similar to the preischemic control value in the University of Wisconsin group. By contrast, a significant increase was found at the beginning of postpreservation reperfusion, with a progressive rise thereafter in the St. Thomas' Hospital group (p less than 0.001). Preservation of myocardial adenosine triphosphate was improved and energy charge was unchanged after 8 hours of ischemia and reperfusion in the University of Wisconsin-preserved hearts compared with the St. Thomas' Hospital-preserved hearts (p less than 0.01). Electron microscopic examination revealed substantially better preservation of the contractile apparatus after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution. Myocytes from hearts receiving University of Wisconsin solution, unlike those given St. Thomas' Hospital solution, showed relaxed myofibrils with prominent I-bands. We conclude that University of Wisconsin solution has the potential to improve the preservation of the heart and possibly prolong the ischemic period in clinical cardiac transplantation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.