• Cancer cytopathology · Sep 2015

    Comparative Study

    Automated 3-dimensional morphologic analysis of sputum specimens for lung cancer detection: Performance characteristics support use in lung cancer screening.

    • David C Wilbur, Michael G Meyer, Chris Presley, Ralph W Aye, Paul Zarogoulidis, Douglas W Johnson, Nir Peled, and Alan C Nelson.
    • VisionGate Inc, Phoenix, Arizona.
    • Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 Sep 1; 123 (9): 548-56.

    BackgroundThe LuCED Lung Test comprises an automated 3-dimensional morphologic analysis of epithelial cells in sputum. For each cell, 594 morphology-based features are measured to drive algorithmic classifiers that quantitatively assess whether neoplastic cells are present. The current interim clinical study involves sputum samples from patients with known benign and malignant outcomes to assess the feasibility of LuCED as an adjunctive test after suspicious low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) results or as an independent screening test for lung cancer.MethodsSputum samples were fixed, enriched for epithelial cells, and analyzed with a 3-dimensional cell scanner called Cell-CT. Candidate abnormal cells were identified by the classifiers for manual review. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated for the detection of neoplastic cases.ResultsA total of 91 sputum samples from patients with confirmed lung cancer (49 patients) and patients with no known malignancy (42 patients) were evaluated. After cytology review, sensitivity in the positive group was 91.8%, and specificity was 95.2%. Specificity was not 100% because there were 2 cases in which abnormal cells were identified by the Cell-CT that were confirmed as such at the time of manual cytology review. However, at the time of last follow-up, malignancy had not been detected in these 2 cases. Modeling in a population with a 1% prevalence of lung cancer, the positive and negative predictive values would be 95.4% and 99.9%, respectively.ConclusionsLuCED testing is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of lung cancer and has potential value as an adjunctive test after suspicious LDCT findings or as a primary screening test in which LuCED-positive cases would be triaged to diagnostic CT. Further prospective studies currently are underway to evaluate its full usefulness.© 2015 American Cancer Society.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…