-
BMJ quality & safety · Oct 2011
Randomized Controlled TrialThe ability of a behaviour-specific patient questionnaire to identify poorly performing doctors.
- Bård Fossli Jensen, Fredrik A Dahl, Dana Gelb Safran, Andrew M Garratt, Edward Krupat, Arnstein Finset, and Pål Gulbrandsen.
- Akershus University Hospital, HØKH Research Centre, Postboks 95, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway; b.f.jensen@medisin.uio.no.
- BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Oct 1;20(10):885-93.
BackgroundDoctors' ability to communicate with patients varies. Patient questionnaires are often used to assess doctors' communication skills.ObjectiveTo investigate whether the Four Habits Patient Questionnaire (4HPQ) can be used to assess the different skill levels of doctors.DesignA cross-sectional study of 497 hospital encounters with 71 doctors. Encounters were videotaped and patients completed three post-visit questionnaires.SettingA 500-bed general teaching hospital in Norway.Main OutcomeThe proportion of video-observed between-doctor variance that could be predicted by 4HPQ.ResultsThere were strong correlations between all patient-reported outcomes (range 0.71-0.80 at the doctor level, p < 0.01). 4HPQ correlated significantly with video-observed behaviour at the doctor level (Pearson's r = 0.42, p<0.01) and the encounter level (Pearson's r = 0.27, p < 0.01). The proportion of between-doctor variance not detectable by 4HPQ was 88%. The reason for this discordance was large within-doctor between-encounter variance observed in the videos, and small between-patient variance in patient reports. The maximum positive predictive value for the identification of poorly performing doctors (92%) was achieved with a cut-off score for 4HPQ of 82% (ie, patient assessments were concordant with expert observers for these doctors).ConclusionUsing a patient-reported questionnaire of doctors' communication skills, favourable assessments of doctors by patients were mostly discordant with the views of expert observers. Only very poor performance identified by patients was in agreement with the views of expert observers. The results suggest that patient reports alone may not be sufficient to identify all doctors whose communication skills need improvement training.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.