• Jian-Wen Huang, Xiao-Sheng Gao, and Yun-Fa Yang.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1 Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, China.
• Injury. 2022 Feb 1; 53 (2): 576-583.

ObjectiveThe implant failures of intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) after single-screw cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) were multifactorially associated with various related factors. However, a comprehensive scoring system for the early prediction of implant failures is still lacking. Thus, this study aims to establish a quantification scoring system (QSS) and verify whether the QSS is reliable for predicting implant failures in geriatric ITF patients.MethodsWe established the QSS of geriatric ITF with single-screw cephalomedullary nailing within three days after surgery. The QSS included eight points totally at eight parameters, including bone quality, fracture type, reduction quality, and internal fixation placement. Then we retrospectively analyzed seventy-seven ITF (seventy-six patients) with surgical treatment between October 2016 and July 2020 in our hospital to verify whether the QSS scoring is suitable for predicting implant failures in ITF patients.ResultsImplant failures were in fifteen fractures (fifteen patients), including six cases of cut-out, eight of pending cut-out, and one of cut-through. There were three cases with 2 points in QSS, three with 3 points, five with 4 points, four with 5 points in these fifteen fractures. No fractures were with 1 point in QSS, and no implant failures when scoring over 5 points in QSS. Except for QSS scoring, no significant difference was in the collected data by binary logistic regression analysis. QSS scoring was significantly associated with implant failures (Adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 7.312; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.561 to 20.871; p < 0.001). In the analysis of Spearman's correlation, there was a strong correlation between QSS scoring and the occurrences of implant failures (RQSS = -0.964, p < 0.001). The ROC result indicated that QSS was reliable in predicting implant failures at the cut-off of 5 points (AUC (the area under the curve) = 0.944; 95% CI, 0.866 to 0.983; p < 0.001).ConclusionThe QSS is a useful early prediction of implant failures in geriatric ITF with cephalomedullary nailing fixation. QSS scoring more than 5 points can effectively reduce the risk of implant failures.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…