• K Wegmann, J Lamsfuss, C Ries, W F Neiss, J Franklin, L P Müller, and K J Burkhart.
• Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Cologne, Germany. Kilian.Wegmann@uk-koeln.de.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Dec 1; 135 (12): 166916741669-74.

IntroductionOverlengthening of the radial column leads to insufficient functionality and increased capitellar wear. Methods to detect or prevent overlengthening have been described for monopolar prostheses. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether one such method described by Athwal et al. is also applicable for a bipolar prosthesis.Materials And MethodsThe radial heads of six fresh frozen upper extremities were resected. A bipolar radial head prosthesis was implanted in each, and the effects of sequential overlengthening on the alignment of the radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral joint line were recorded by fluoroscopic images. Digital image analysis and estimation of overlengthening followed according to the method described by Athwal et al.ResultsStatistical analysis of the estimated and actual differences between the native state and bipolar replacement of the radial head with stepwise overlengthening of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 mm showed a specificity of 86 % but consistently underestimated the amount of overlengthening with a sensitivity of only 61 %.DiscussionThe method described by Athwal et al. for the identification of overlengthening by a monopolar prosthesis was not found to be reliable for ruling out or quantifying overlengthening of the tested bipolar prosthesis. However, the use of the method to detect (rule in) overlengthening may be acceptable in certain circumstances. A reliable method for postoperative quantification of overlengthening by bipolar prostheses has still to be found.

34 keywords...

hide…