• Neuromodulation · Jan 2022

    Review

    The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations on Best Practices for Cervical Neurostimulation.

    • Timothy R Deer, Marc Russo, Jay S Grider, Jason Pope, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Jacqueline Weisbein, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Ramsin Benyamin, Louis J Raso, Kiran V Patel, David Provenzano, Philip S Kim, Kasra Amirdelfan, Robert Bolash, Monique Steegers, Richard Sullivan, Paul Verrills, Jon Carlson, Leo Kapural, Sudhir Diwan, Giancarlo Barolat, Peter A Pahapill, Jose De Andres, Ahmed M Raslan, Jose A Lopez, Michael S Leong, Miguel B Attias, Peter Teddy, Alexander L Green, Alessandro Dario, Fabian Piedimonte, Kenneth B Chapman, Nestor D Tomycz, James FitzGerald, Kliment Gatzinsky, Vishal Varshney, Brandon Gish, Brad L Lindsey, Asokumar Buvanendran, Tim J Lamer, Konstantin V Slavin, and Robert M Levy.
    • The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA. Electronic address: doctdeer@aol.com.
    • Neuromodulation. 2022 Jan 1; 25 (1): 35-52.

    IntroductionThe International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the use of neurostimulation in the cervical region to improve outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for an often-overlooked area of neurostimulation practice.Materials And MethodsAuthors were chosen based upon their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant.ResultsThe NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process.ConclusionsThe NACC recommends best practices regarding the use of cervical neuromodulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be utilized as a guide to assist decision making when clinically appropriate.Copyright © 2021 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…