• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Jul 2013

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of 2011 and 2007 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines for predicting mortality and hospitalization.

    • Ane Johannessen, Amund Gulsvik, Per Bakke, Michael Storebø, and Tomas Eagan.
    • Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. ane.johannessen@helse-bergen.no
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):51-9.

    RationaleThe GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) 2011 update on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) bases disease classification on level of dyspnea, exacerbation history, and FEV1, whereas the previous GOLD categorized disease severity according to FEV1 only. Information on how the new classification predicts long-term hospitalizations and mortality is limited.ObjectivesTo examine how GOLD 2011 predicts hospitalizations and mortality over an 8-year period and to assess differences in predictive ability between GOLD 2011 and GOLD 2007.MethodsIn the GenKOLS study, 912 patients with COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and FEV1 < 80% predicted) aged 40 to 91 years were clinically examined. Patients answered questionnaires and performed lung function testing in 2003-2005. The population was followed for 8 years regarding hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory) and mortality (all-cause, respiratory, cardiovascular). We performed logistic regression and receiver operating curve analyses for GOLD 2007 and GOLD 2011 with estimations of area under the curve (AUC) to compare the different classifications.Measurements And Main ResultsTwenty percent of patients were classified as GOLD 2011 group A (mild), 30% as group B, 6% group as C, and 44% as group D (very severe). Patients in GOLD 2011 group D had odds ratios of 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-6.7), 9.6 (95% CI, 3.4-27.0), and 3.0 (95% CI, 0.7-13.2) relative to group A for all-cause, respiratory, and cardiovascular mortality, respectively, and 3.8 (95% CI, 2.4-5.9) and 13.0 (95% CI, 6.6-25.6) for all-cause and respiratory hospitalizations, respectively. Associations were similar also for GOLD 2007. The adjusted AUC values for GOLD 2011 and GOLD 2007 were 0.82/0.82 for respiratory mortality (P = 0.87) and 0.77/0.76 for respiratory hospitalizations (P = 0.51).ConclusionsThe predictive ability of GOLD 2011 did not differ significantly from GOLD 2007 in terms of hospitalizations and mortality.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.