• Palliative medicine · Jan 2022

    Multicenter Study

    Effect of continuous deep sedation on survival in the last days of life of cancer patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

    • Naosuke Yokomichi, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Isseki Maeda, Masanori Mori, Kengo Imai, Shirado NaitoAkemiADepartment of Palliative Care, Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan., Takashi Yamaguchi, Toru Terabayashi, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Takayuki Hisanaga, and Tatsuya Morita.
    • Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
    • Palliat Med. 2022 Jan 1; 36 (1): 189-199.

    BackgroundContinuous deep sedation is ethically controversial with respect to whether it shortens a patient's life.AimTo examine whether continuous deep sedation shortens patient survival from the day of Palliative Performance Scale decline to 20 (PPS20).DesignA part of a multicenter prospective cohort study (EASED study).Setting/ParticipantsWe recruited consecutive adult patients with advanced cancer admitted to 23 participating palliative care units in 2017 in Japan. We compared survival from PPS20 between those who did and did not receive continuous deep sedation. Continuous deep sedation was defined as the continuous administration of sedative medication with the intention to keep a patient continuously unconscious to alleviate otherwise uncontrollable symptoms, but the dose of sedatives was adjusted to achieve adequate symptom relief for each patient. The propensity score-weighting method was used to control for potential confounders, and five sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsA total of 1926 patients were enrolled. Patients discharged alive were excluded, and we analyzed 1625 patients of whom 156 (9.6%) received continuous deep sedation. Median survival from PPS20 of 1625 patients was 81 h (95% CI: 77-88). The RASS scores decreased to ⩽-4 was 66% at 24 h. Continuous deep sedation was not associated with a significant survival risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85-1.33). All sensitivity analyses, including continuous deep sedation defined as the RASS score was ⩽-4 achieved the essentially the same results.ConclusionsContinuous deep sedation with careful dose adjustment was not associated with shorter survival in the last days of life in patients with advanced cancer.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.